tangent_woman had a discussion about PMS and how some men use its mere possibility as an excuse to belittle women and ignore their legitimate concerns. I commented that, in many cases, men seem to react with surprise to a woman's emotionally-charged complaint because they're oblivious to the less emotional, more subtle complaints that preceded it. You can hint a dozen times that they should wash up before you go off the handle, but from their point of view the going-off came out of the blue with absolutely no warning.
tangent_woman made the point that one manifestation of male privilege may well be that
men have the option to be ignorant of stuff that only affect women, whereas women don't have the matching option.
It's a bloody good point! It also extends to other forms of privilege.
For example, I don't know if most of the websites I design work really well in screen readers for the blind. Even when I was working for AGIMO, a quasi (or queasy) government organisation (run by clueless potplants, especially the useless incompetent coward who was my boss... but I digress) that had a strong emphasis on accessibility, it wasn't until I ran my designs past some actual experts that I found out just how many mistakes I'd made that would have made the sites all but unusable.
I'm not blind or visually impaired, so I have the privilege of being ignorant about accessibility. In my defence, I did try to get it right, and over a few iterations I did better than every other worthless bastard in that place and most of the rest of the government, but I still had the advantage of sighted-person privilege to save me from
needing to learn.
Similarly, I could go my entire life not understanding why some women get so hysterical (pun intended) every 28 days, more or less. Being male, I have the ability to remain ignorant. Now, as it happens, I've experienced hypoglycaemic moodswings myself, and discovered first-hand that getting all emotional is not, in fact, a sign of mental infirmity. (Gosh! Stone the crows!) It's not the same thing, but it's miles away from the default male assumption of female frailty. But without that more-or-less coincidental burst of enforced empathy, I could be ignorant forever, and not even know it.
There's more. I know very little of the truth about those
brave refugees fleeing oppression and striving for a better life for their families queue-jumping people-smuggled terrorist so-called asylum seekers taking advantage of our nation's wealth... because I don't have to. I don't need to form an opinion about whether they're here for good reasons or ill. I can go ahead and vote for our boring and disappointing PM in the next election without stopping to consider the relative merits of his alleged policy vs the opposition's nearly-but-not-quite-identical policy. I don't need to know or care, and with so much else to do, I can generally avoid it. It might be that one or other party out there has a sane, compassionate and reasonable policy on "illegal" immigration, but I haven't really looked into it. I can afford to be ignorant, because I was born here and I'm white and I speak excellent English and I have a house to live in. White middle-class resident privilege = a license to remain ignorant.
It's a disturbing thought. How much privilege am I relying on without know it, simply because I don't know it? And along with that, how much
should I know? Would a fuller appreciation of Tampa vs Oceanic Viking make me reconsider my vote? Should it? Is it as important as the other matters that strike closer to home?
Should it be?We all remain ignorantly privileged, I think, because the alternative is paralysis. Every action I perform, every thought I think, is informed by privilege: I walk because I'm not quadruplegic, I breathe easily because I'm not in a South American prison, I think clearly because I'm not clinically depressed. If I tried to stop and "consider those less fortunate", I'd never start again.
Which is not to say I can keep glorying in my ignorance. I'm not a member of terribly many minorities (odd that "female", at 50.1% of human population, still shows up as a minority in most ways that count, but then so does "poor", at 99.8%) but every time I try to understand someone, I improve my odds.
A couple thousand more steps, and I may get good enough.